Effect of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion strength ratios in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability
Objectives: To examine the effect of six weeks of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion isokinetic strength ratios (E/ l ratios) in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability.
Methods: Thirty eight subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: strength training (S); proprioception training (P); strength + proprioception training (B); control (C). Isokinetic strength was tested before and after training using a Kin Com 125 automatic positioning isokinetic dynamometer. Subtalar joint eversion and inversion motions were tested both concentrically and eccentrically through a range of motion involving 40°. All peak torque and average torque values were normalised for body mass. E/l ratios were calculated from average torque and peak torque measures by taking the concentric eversion value and combining it with the eccentric inversion value. Data were analysed using a mixed model analysis of variance with repeated measures on the test factor. Average torque and peak torque E/l ratios at 30 and 120°/s were analysed separately.
Results: There were no significant differences in average torque and peak torque E/l ratios of the functionally unstable ankle for any of the groups after training compared with before.
Conclusions: Six weeks of strength and proprioception training (either alone or combined) had no effect on isokinetic measures of strength in subjects with self reported unilateral functional instability. Further studies examining this agonist (concentric) to antagonist (eccentric) muscle group strength ratio are needed.
Public Health and Sports Medicine
Kaminski, T. W., B. D. Buckley, M. E. Powers, T. J. Hubbard, and C. Ortiz. "Effect of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion strength ratios in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability." British journal of sports medicine 37, no. 5 (2003): 410-415.
British Journal of Sports Medicine