Thesis Title
Comparison of Trial-Based, Synthesized Trial-Based, and Traditional Functional Analyses
Date of Graduation
Fall 2017
Degree
Master of Science in Education in Special Education
Department
Counseling, Leadership, and Special Education
Committee Chair
Megan Boyle
Keywords
autism, problem behavior, functional analyses, trial-based, synthesized
Subject Categories
Applied Behavior Analysis | Special Education and Teaching
Abstract
I evaluated a synthesized trial-based functional analysis with two students who engaged in problem behavior by combining the methods from the trial-based functional analysis and synthesized contingency functional analysis. Multiple test conditions were combined into one test condition and were evaluated in 2-min trials. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of correspondence of the results between the trial-based, synthesized trial-based, and traditional function analyses. One participant showed exact correspondence between the three functional analyses, while the other participant showed partial correspondence.
Copyright
© Kara Leigh Forck
Recommended Citation
Forck, Kara Leigh, "Comparison of Trial-Based, Synthesized Trial-Based, and Traditional Functional Analyses" (2017). MSU Graduate Theses. 3213.
https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3213
Open Access