Peacekeeper: a Case Study of Strategic Debate
Date of Graduation
Summer 1992
Degree
Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies
Department
Defense and Strategic Studies
Committee Chair
Rood Harold
Abstract
This thesis is an examination of the strategic debate surrounding the development and deployment of the U.S. Peacekeeper Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. Included is historical background information on the development of ICBMs, the emergence of Mutual Assured Destruction doctrine, the modification of that doctrine, and the changing requirements for ICBMs. The main sections are an examination of the major decisions for development and deployment made by the Carter and Reagan Administrations for both ICBMs and their basing mode. The examination of these decisions illuminate the range of options for U.S. nuclear deployments and the nuclear strategy of the United States. This examination reveals that U.S. strategy and planning policies, and consequently have lacked a sufficiently full appreciation of strategy and defense as more than deterrence.
Subject Categories
Defense and Security Studies
Copyright
© Kevin A Cloonan
Recommended Citation
Cloonan, Kevin A., "Peacekeeper: a Case Study of Strategic Debate" (1992). MSU Graduate Theses/Dissertations. 333.
https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/333
Dissertation/Thesis