Date of Graduation
Fall 2009
Degree
Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies
Department
Defense and Strategic Studies
Committee Chair
Keith Payne
Abstract
It has become fashionable amongst some critics of the George W. Bush administration to say that the centerpiece of his foreign policy, the promotion of democracy in the Middle East, is endemically flawed because the religious, political, or cultural conditions in the region would constrain, or prohibit outright, democratization. However, upon examination, the central cultural and religious institutions of the region do not appear to have an endemic impact on democratic governance one way or the other. Both the tribal system and Islam have avenues for liberalized freedom, just as they do for authoritarianism. Meanwhile, the two most liberalized nations of the Middle East – Turkey and Kuwait – face difficulties on their own paths to democratization. One faces a renewed Islamist encroachment against its traditional secular political order; while, in the other, liberalization has had some successes and enjoys some degree of real power, but its hold is tenuous, and can be undone at any time. Nevertheless, representative democracy is slowly but surely gaining a lasting foothold in these states, and can serve as models for the region to adopt.
Keywords
Middle East, democracy, tribalism, Islam, Kuwait, Turkey
Subject Categories
Defense and Security Studies
Copyright
© Evan David Moore
Recommended Citation
Moore, Evan David, "The Final Frontier of Freedom: a Prospectus for Future Democratization of the Middle East" (2009). MSU Graduate Theses. 1449.
https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1449
Campus Only
