Title
Subperiod robustness checks: testing for effect mean stationarity
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to suggest a superior method for assessing mean stationarity of asset pricing effects.
Design/methodology/approach: The authors suggest the use of an F‐test to examine mean stationarity of asset pricing effects across subperiods. The superiority of this test is demonstrated through examination of the Halloween Effect using simulated data and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) data for 18 developed economies.
Findings: It is found that the suggested F‐test provides results superior to a simple examination of the magnitude and statistical significance of estimated regression coefficients across subperiods when attempting to determine mean stationarity.
Originality/value: This paper sheds light on an analytical oversight in the asset pricing anomalies literature and suggests an appropriate test to address this oversight.
Department(s)
Finance and General Business
Document Type
Article
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351211217841
Keywords
econometrics, assets, pricing, calendar anomalies, stationarity, econometric methods
Publication Date
2012
Recommended Citation
Haggard, K. Stephen, and H. Douglas Witte. "Subperiod robustness checks: testing for effect mean stationarity." Managerial Finance (2012).
Journal Title
Managerial Finance