Title
Do response rates matter in entrepreneurship research?
Abstract
For many scientific disciplines that rely on surveys and voluntary participation (e.g., organizational behavior, psychology), nonresponse bias (NRB) has been shown to bias estimates, create range restriction, and lead to both Type I and Type II errors. The present research endeavors to fill a methodological gap in the entrepreneurship literature by presenting the following findings: (a) response rates in entrepreneurship research (39%) are higher than firm-level research in management, but lower than individual-level management research, (b) there is virtually no evidence that response rate has any meaningful or consistent influence on relationships in entrepreneurship, and (c) there is little evidence of selective reporting when response rates are low. These promising findings should give entrepreneurship researchers cautious optimism that at least in the aggregate, NRB has limited impact.
Document Type
Article
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.07.003
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Non-response bias, Response rates
Publication Date
11-1-2017
Recommended Citation
Rutherford, Matthew W., Ernest H. O’Boyle, Chao Miao, Daniel Goering, and Joseph E. Coombs. "Do response rates matter in entrepreneurship research?." Journal of Business Venturing Insights 8 (2017): 93-98.
Journal Title
Journal of Business Venturing Insights