Date of Graduation
Spring 2014
Degree
Master of Arts in Religious Studies
Department
Religious Studies
Committee Chair
John Schmalzbauer
Abstract
Sociologists and religion scholars have made broad statements about people who identify as "spiritual but not religious." To determine whether such generalizations are justified, in-depth interviews were conducted with twelve people who identify themselves as "spiritual but not religious" and who currently live or recently lived in the southern United States. These interviews covered the topics of beliefs, practices, and material culture. Three distinct subgroups of "spiritual but not religious" were identified: Metaphysicals, Spiritual Pluralists, and Free-Range Christians. The interviews also revealed attitudes that transcended these subgroups, and the vast majority of respondents rejected the category "religious." These findings lead to the conclusion that scholars and journalists must take care when speaking about those who are "spiritual but not religious." They must make certain that what they are stating actually does transcend each subgroup of "spiritual but not religious" to include all groups. Recognition of these subgroups is necessary when discussing people who reject religious identifiers in favor of spiritual ones.
Keywords
spiritual but not religious, spirituality, religion, metaphysicals, pluralists, free-range christians
Subject Categories
Religion
Copyright
© Steven Wayne Fouse
Recommended Citation
Fouse, Steven Wayne, "Losing My Religion: Spiritual but Not Religious Metaphysicals, Spiritual Pluralists, and Free-Range Christians" (2014). MSU Graduate Theses. 2592.
https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/2592
Campus Only